ÃÀ¼Ó¼ì·½ÆðËß»ªÎªCFOÃÏÍíÖÛÈ«ÎĹ«²¼
µ±µØÊ±¼ä12ÔÂ6ÈÕ£¬»ªÎªÊ×ϯ²ÆÎñ¹ÙÃÏÍíÖÛÓÚ12ÔÂ1ÈÕÔÚ¼ÓÄô󱻲¶Ò»Ê±»ÆØ¹â£¬Òý·¢Á˹úÄÚÍâµÄ¹ã·º¹Ø×¢¡£µ±µØÊ¼þ12ÔÂ7ÈÕ£¬ÃÏÍíÖ۵ı£ÊÍÌýÖ¤»áÔÚ¼ÓÄôó±°Ê«Ê¡×î¸ß·¨Ôº¾ÙÐС£²»¹ýÔÚµ±ÌìµÄÍ¥ÉóÉÏ£¬·¨¹Ù²¢Î´½øÐÐÏà¹ØÅоö¡£µ±µØÊ±¼äÏÂÖÜÒ»£¬Í¥É󽫻á¼ÌÐø¡£¶øÔÚ7ÈÕÍ¥Éóµ±Ì죬Õë¶ÔÐÂÎÅýÌåµÄ½ûÖ¹±¨µÀÁîÒѾ±»È¡Ïû£¬ËùÒÔÔÚÍ¥ÉóÖ®ºó£¬²¿·ÖÏà¹ØµÄÍ¥ÉóÎļþºÍ×ÊÁÏÒ²¿ªÊ¼±»ÆØ¹â¡£
ÒÔÏÂΪÃÀ¼Ó¼ì·½ÆðËßÃÏÍíÖÛµÄÈ«ÎÄ£¨ÖÐÓ¢ÎĶÔÕÕ£¬ÓÐɾ¼õ£©£º
Summary of Facts
ÊÂʵժҪ
Wanzhou Meng £¨¡°Meng¡±£©£¬ also known as ¡°Cathy Meng¡± and ¡°Sabrina Meng£¬¡± is the Chief Financial Officer £¨¡°CFO¡±£© of Huawei Technologies Co£® Ltd£® £¨Huawei¡±£©£¬ a corporation organized under the laws of the People¡¯s Republic of China £¨¡°PRC¡±£© and the world¡¯s largest telecommunications equipment company£® Meng is a citizen of the PRC and a daughter of Huawei¡¯s founder£¬ Ren Zhengfei£® In addition to her role as CFO£¬ Meng currently serves as Huawei¡¯s Deputy Chairwoman of the Board£¬ and serves or has served in various roles at other Huawei subsidiaries and affiliates£® Meng also served on the board of Hong Kong£based Skycom Tech Co£® Ltd£® £¨¡°Skycom¡±£© in or about and between February 2008 and April 2009£® According to financial statements for Skycom for the years 2009 and 2010£¬ the ¡°principal activities of Skycom were engaged in £Ûsic£Ý investment holding and acting as a contractor for contracts undertaking £Ûsic£Ý in Iran£®¡±
ÃÏÍíÖÛ£¬Ó¢ÎÄÃûCathy Meng»òSabrina Meng£¬ÊÇ»ªÎª¼¼ÊõÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾£¨ÒÔϼò³Æ¡°»ªÎª¡±£©µÄÊ×ϯ²ÆÎñ¹Ù¡£»ªÎªÒÀ¾ÝÖйúµÄ·¨ÂÉÔËÓª£¬ÊÇÈ«Çò×î´óµÄµçÐÅÉ豸ÌṩÉÌ¡£ÃÏÍíÖÛÊÇÖйú¹«Ãñ£¬ÆäΪ»ªÎª´´Ê¼ÈËÈÎÕý·ÇµÄÅ®¶ù¡£³ýÁËÊÇCFO£¬ËýÒ²ÊÇ»ªÎªµÄ¸±¶Ê³¤¡£Ëý»¹ÔÚ¶à¼Ò»ªÎª×Ó¹«Ë¾Öе£Èιý»òÕýÔÚµ£ÈÎÖ°Îñ¡£ÃÏÍíÖÛÒ²ÔøÓÚ2008Äê2ÔÂÖÁ2009Äê4ÔÂǰºó£¬ÔÚ×ܲ¿Î»ÓÚÏã¸ÛµÄSkycom¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾£¨ÒÔϼò³Æ¡°Skycom¡±£©µ£Èιý¶Ê¡£Skycom 2009ºÍ2010ÄêµÄ²Æ±¨ÏÔʾ£ºSkycomµÄÖ÷ÒªÒµÎñÊÇͶ×ʿعɲ¢µ£ÈÎÓëÒÁÀÊ£¨Ç©¶©£©µÄºÏͬµÄ³Ð°üÉÌ¡£
According to information obtained through an investigation by U£®S£® authorities£¬ including the following£¬ Huawei operated Skycom as an unofficial subsidiary to conduct business in Iran while concealing Skycom¡¯s link to Huawei£® In this manner and as explained in further detail below£¬ Huawei could conceal the nature of certain business it was conducting in and related to Iran£¬ which is generally considered a high£risk jurisdiction£®
¸ù¾ÝÃÀ¹úµ±¾Öµ÷²éËù»ñµÃµÄÐÅÏ¢£¨ÒÔÏÂÓÐÊö£©£º»ªÎª½«Skycom×÷Ϊ·Ç¹Ù·½µÄ×Ó¹«Ë¾ÔËÓª£¬ÒÔ´Ë¿ªÕ¹ÔÚÒÁÀʵÄÒµÎñ£¬Í¬Ê±ÒþÂ÷ÁËÁ½¼Ò¹«Ë¾¼äµÄÁªÏµ¡£»ªÎªÓÃÕâÖÖ·½Ê½ÒþÂ÷ÁËËüÔÚÒÁÀʾ³ÄÚ¿ªÕ¹µÄÒÔ¼°ÓëÒÁÀÊÓйصÄÒµÎñÐÅÏ¢£¬¶øÕâÒ»¿éͨ³£±»ÈÏΪÊÇÒ»¸ö¸ß·çÏÕ¹ÜÏ½Çø¡£¾ßÌåϸ½ÚÈçÏ¡·
Former employees of Skycom have stated£¬ in sum and substance£¬ that Skycom was not distinct from Huawei£® For example£¬ Skycom employees had Huawei email addresses and badges£¬ individuals working in Iran used different sets of stationery £¨¡°Huawei¡± and ¡°Skycom¡±£© for different business purposes£¬ and the leadership of Skycom in Iran were Huawei employees£»
¸ù¾ÝSkycomǰ¹ÍÔ±µÄ³ÂÊö£¬ÎÞÂÛÊÇÕûÌ廹ÊÇϸ½Ú£¬Skycom¶¼ºÍ»ªÎª¹ØÏµÃÜÇС£ÀýÈ磬SkycomµÄ¹ÍÔ±ÓûªÎªµÄµçÓʵØÖ·£¬ÓлªÎªµÄ»ÕÕ¡£ÔÚÒÁÀʹ¤×÷µÄÈËÔ±¸ù¾Ý²»Í¬µÄÒµÎñÐèҪʹÓò»Í¬µÄÎľߣ¨»ªÎªºÍSkycom¶¼ÓУ©¡£SkycomÔÚÒÁÀʵÄÁìµ¼²ãÊÇ»ªÎªµÄ¹ÍÔ±£»
Documents show that multiple Skycom bank accounts were controlled by Huawei employees£¬ and Huawei employees were signatories on these accounts between 2007 and 2013£»
ÎļþÏÔʾ£¬¶à¸öSkycomµÄÒøÐÐÕ˺ÅÊÇÓÉ»ªÎª¹ÍÔ±¿ØÖƵģ¬ÕâЩ¹ÍÔ±2007£2013Äê¼äÊÇÕË»§µÄÇ©×ÖÈË£»
Documents and email records show that persons listed as ¡°Managing Directors¡± for Skycom were Huawei employees£»
ÎĵµºÍµç×ÓÓʼþµÄ¼Ç¼ÏÔʾ£º±»ÁÐΪ¡°Skycom¾Àí¡±µÄÈËÔ±ÊÇ»ªÎªµÄ¹ÍÔ±£»
Skycom official documents£¬ including several Memoranda of Understanding£¬ bore the Huawei logo£»
SkycomµÄ¹Ù·½Îļþ£¬°üÀ¨¼¸·Ý±¸Íü¼£¬ÉÏÃæÓÐHuaweiµÄÉ̱ꣻ
Email correspondence and other records show that all identified Skycom business was conducted using ¡°£Àhuawei£®com¡± email addresses£» and
µçÓÊͨÐÅºÍÆäËü¼Ç¼ÏÔʾ£ºËùÓб»È·ÈϵÄSkycomµÄÒµÎñʹÓõͼÊǰüº¬¡°£Àhuawei£®com¡±µÄµçÓʵØÖ·£»
Documents show that a purportedly unrelated entity to which Skycom was supposedly ¡°sold¡± in 2009 was actually also controlled by Huawei until at least in or about 2014£®
ÎļþÏÔʾ£º¾Ý´«2009ÄêÊÕ¹ºÁËSkycomµÄÒ»¼ÒÏÈǰ±»ÈÏΪ²¢²»Ïà¹ØµÄʵÌåÊÂʵÉÏÒ²ÊÇÓÉ»ªÎª¿ØÖƵģ¬Ö±µ½2014Äêǰºó¡£
Transactional records and other documents obtained by U£®S£® authorities further demonstrate that Huawei operated Skycom as an unofficial subsidiary to conduct business in Iran while concealing Skycom¡¯s link to Huawei£® Among other things£¬ records obtained through the investigation show that Skycom was used to transact telecommunications business in Iran for major Iranian£based telecommunications companies£®
ÃÀ¹úµ±¾Ö»ñÈ¡µÄ½»Ò׼ǼºÍÆäËûÎļþ½øÒ»²½ÏÔʾ£º»ªÎª°ÑSkycom×÷Ϊ·Ç¹Ù·½µÄ×Ó¹«Ë¾À´ÔËÓª£¬Ä¿µÄÊÇΪÁËÔÚÒÁÀÊ¿ªÕ¹ÒµÎñ£¬Í¬Ê±ÒþÂ÷ÆðÁËSkycomÓ뻪ΪµÄ¹ØÏµ¡£´ËÍ⣬µ÷²éµÄ¼Ç¼ÏÔʾ£¬Skycom±»ÓÃÀ´ÎªÒÁÀÊÖ÷ÒªµÄµçÐŹ«Ë¾¾ÓªµçÐÅÒµÎñ¡£
PROVISIONAL ARREST REQUEST FOR WANZHOU MENG
ÃÏÍíÖÛÁÙʱ´þ²¶ÇëÇóÊé
The investigation by U£®S£® authorities has revealed a conspiracy between and among Meng and other Huawei representatives to misrepresent to numerous multinational financial institutions£¬ including a global financial institution which conducts business in the United States £¨¡°Financial Institution 1¡±£©£¬ Huawei¡¯s business practices£¬ particularly Huawei¡¯s control of Skycom in or about and between 2009 and 2014£® Specifically£¬ Meng and other Huawei representatives repeatedly lied about the nature of the relationship between Huawei and Skycom and the fact that Skycom operated as Huawei¡¯s Iran£based affiliate in order to continue to obtain banking services from multinational financial institutions£®
ÃÀ¹úµ±¾ÖµÄµ÷²éÏÔʾ£ºÃÏÍíÖÛºÍÆäËû»ªÎª´ú±í¹²Ä±ÏòÖÚ¶à¿ç¹ú½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹×öÁËÐé¼Ù³ÂÊö£¬°üÀ¨Ò»¼ÒÔÚÃÀ¹ú¿ªÕ¹ÒµÎñµÄÈ«ÇòÐÔ½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹£¨ÒÔϼò³ÆÎª£º½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹1£©¡£Ðé¼Ù³ÂÊöµÄÄÚÈÝÉæ¼°»ªÎªµÄÒµÎñ£¬ÖصãÊÇ»ªÎªÔÚ2009£2014Äê¼ä¶ÔSkycomµÄ¿ØÖÆÈ¨¡£¾ßÌå¶øÑÔ£¬ÃÏÍíÖÛºÍÆäËû»ªÎª´ú±íÔÚ»ªÎªºÍSkycom¹ØÏµµÄʵÖÊÉÏ·´¸´Èö»Ñ£¬ÒþÂ÷ÁËSkycom×÷Ϊ»ªÎªÔÚÒÁÀʵĸ½Êô¹«Ë¾ÔËÓªµÄÊÂʵ£¬ÕâЩÐÐΪµÄÄ¿µÄÊÇΪÁË´Ó¿ç¹ú½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹´¦¼ÌÐø»ñµÃÒøÐзþÎñ¡£
The motivation for these misrepresentations stemmed from Huawei¡¯s need to move money out of countries that are subject to U£®S£® or E£®U£® sanctions ? such as Iran£¬ Syria£¬ or Sudan ? through the international banking system£® At various times£¬ both the U£®S£® and E£®U£® legal regimes have imposed sanctions that prohibit the provision of U£®S£® or E£®U£® services to Iran£¬ such as banking services£® Of particular relevance£¬ companies such as Huawei operating in sanctioned countries often need to repatriate income out of those countries by relying on U£®S£®£dollar clearing transactions£¬ which typically pass through the United States£¬ or Euro£clearing transactions£¬ which typically pass through E£®U£® countries£® Huawei was a customer of Financial Institution 1 and the other victim institutions£¬ and conducted a significant amount of its international banking activity£¬ including U£®S£®£dollar£clearing transactions£¬ with Financial Institution 1£® The financial institutions at issue£¬ including Financial Institution 1£¬ maintained policies by which they would not onboard Iran£based clients or process Iran£related transactions through the United States£¬ so as to avoid exposure to U£®S£® civil and criminal liability£® In response to due diligence inquiries by the banks regarding these internal policies£¬ Meng and other Huawei representatives repeated stated that Huawei did not operate Skycom and that£¬ with respect to Financial Institution 1£¬ Huawei would not use Financial Institution 1 to process any Iran£related transactions£®
ÕâЩÐé¼Ù³ÂËߵ͝»úÔ´ÓÚ»ªÎªÐèҪͨ¹ý¹ú¼ÊÒøÐÐϵͳ½«×ʽð´ÓÊÜÃÀ¹ú»òÅ·ÃËÖÆ²ÃµÄ¹ú¼Ò£¨ÈçÒÁÀÊ¡¢ÐðÀûÑÇ»òËÕµ¤£©×ªÒƳöÈ¥¡£ÃÀ¹úºÍÅ·Ã˵ķ¨ÂÉÌåϵ¶à´ÎÊµÊ©ÖÆ²Ã£¬½ûÖ¹ÏòÒÁÀÊÌṩÃÀÅ·µÄ·þÎñ£¨ÈçÒøÐзþÎñ£©¡£ÓÈÆäÐèҪעÒâµÄÊÇ£¬»ªÎªÕâÑùÔÚÊÜÖÆ²Ã¹ú¼Ò¿ªÕ¹ÒµÎñµÄ¹«Ë¾¾³£ÐèÒªÒÀ¿¿ÃÀÔª½áËã½»Ò×£¨Í¨³£Í¨¹ýÃÀ¹ú£©»òÅ·Ôª½áËã½»Ò×£¨Í¨³£Í¨¹ýÅ·Ã˹ú¼Ò£©£¬´ÓÊÜÖÆ²Ã¹ú¼Òת»ØÊÕÈë¡£»ªÎªÔøÊǽðÈÚ»ú¹¹1ºÍÆäËûÊܺ¦»ú¹¹µÄ¿Í»§¡£»ªÎªÓë½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹1½øÐÐÁË´óÁ¿µÄ¹ú¼ÊÒøÐÐÒµÎñ£¬°üÀ¨ÃÀÔª½áËã½»Òס£Éæ¼°µÄ°üÀ¨½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹1ÔÚÄڵĽðÈÚ»ú¹¹¶¼ÓÐÏà¹ØÕþ²ß£¬²»Óë×ܲ¿ÔÚÒÁÀʵĿͻ§½øÐн»Ò×£¬Ò²²»Í¨¹ýÃÀ¹ú´¦ÀíÓëÒÁÀÊÏà¹ØµÄ½»Ò×£¬ÒÔÃâ³Ðµ£ÃÀ¹úµÄÃñÊ»òÐÌÊÂÔðÈΡ£Õë¶ÔÒøÐоÍÕâЩÄÚ²¿Õþ²ß½øÐеľ¡Ö°µ÷²é£¬ÃÏÍíÖÛºÍÆäËû»ªÎª´ú±í·´¸´±íʾ£º»ªÎª²»¿Ø¹ÉSkycom£¬Ò²²»»áÀûÓýðÈÚ»ú¹¹1À´´¦ÀíÈκÎÓëÒÁÀÊÏà¹ØµÄ½»Òס£
Because Meng and other Huawei representatives misrepresented to Financial Institution 1 and the other financial institutions about Huawei¡¯s relationship with Skycom£¬ these victim banking institutions were induced into carrying out transactions that they otherwise would not have completed£® As a result£¬ they violated the banks¡¯ internal policies£¬ potentially violated U£®S£® sanctions laws£¬ and exposed the banks to the risk of fines and forfeiture£® In particular£¬ these relationships included the clearing of hundreds of millions of U£®S£®£dollar transactions through correspondent accounts at financial institutions in Eurozone countries£® In essence£¬ these misrepresentations exposed the financial institutions to serious harm and denied the institutions the opportunity to make decisions based on the true risk of processing certain transaction and the reputations risk associated with banking high£risk clients such as Huawei£®
ÒòΪÃÏÍíÖÛºÍÆäËû»ªÎª´ú±íÏò½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹1ºÍÆäËû½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹Ðé¼Ù³ÂÊöÁË»ªÎªÓëSkycomµÄ¹ØÏµ£¬ÕâЩÊܺ¦µÄÒøÐлú¹¹±»ÓÕʹ½øÐÐÁËÔ±¾²»»á·¢ÉúµÄ½»Òס£½á¹û£¬ËüÃÇÎ¥·´ÁËÒøÐеÄÄÚ²¿Õþ²ß£¬²¢ÓпÉÄÜÒò´ËÎ¥·´ÁËÃÀ¹úµÄÖÆ²Ã·¨°¸£¬ÃæÁÙ×Å·£¿îºÍ±»µõÏú×ʸñµÄ·çÏÕ¡£×¢Ò⣬»ªÎªÓëSkycomµÄ¹ØÏµ°üÀ¨Í¨¹ýÅ·ÔªÇø¹ú¼Ò½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹µÄÍùÀ´ÕË»§½áËãÁËÊýÒÚÃÀÔªµÄ½»Òס£ÊµÖÊÉÏ£¬ÕâЩÐé¼Ù³ÂÊöʹ½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹ÃæÁÙמ޴óµÄΣÏÕ£¬Ê¹ËüÃÇÎÞ·¨Åжϳö½øÐÐijЩ½»Ò×µÄÕæÊµ·çÏÕ£¬²¢¸ù¾ÝÕâÐ©ÕæÊµ·çÏÕ×ö³öÅжϣ¬Ò²Ê¹ËûÃÇÎÞ·¨ÅжÏÓ뻪ΪÕâÑùµÄÒøÐи߷çÏÕ¿Í»§½øÐн»Ò×ËùðµÄÉùÓþ·çÏÕ¡£
For example£¬ during the relevant timeframe£¬ Financial Institution 1 was under investigation for U£®S£® sanctions violations involving Iran and later entered into a deferred prosecution agreement pertaining to U£®S£® sanctions violations involving Iran£¬ and could therefore have suffered criminal consequences for processing Huawei¡¯s Iran£based transactions£®
ÀýÈ磬ÔÚÏà¹ØÊ±ÏÞÄÚ£¬½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹1ÕýÒòΪΥ·´ÁËÃÀ¹ú¶ÔÒÁÀʵÄÖÆ²Ã£¨·¨°¸£©¶ø½ÓÊܵ÷²é£¬Ö®ºó´ï³ÉÁËÑÓ³ÙÆðËßÐÒ飬²¢¿ÉÄÜÒòΪΥ·´ÁËÉÏÊö·¨°¸£¨´¦ÀíÁË»ªÎªÔÚÒÁÀʵĽ»Ò×£©¶øÃæÁÙ×ÅÐÌÊ´¦·£¡£
Relying on the misrepresentations by Meng and other Huawei representatives£¬ Financial Institution 1 and its U£®S£® subsidiary cleared more than ¡ç100 million worth of transactions related to Skycom through the United States between approximately 2010 and 2014£®
¸ù¾ÝÃÏÍíÖÛºÍÆäËû»ªÎª´ú±íËù×öµÄÐé¼Ù³ÂÊö£¬½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹1¼°ÆäÃÀ¹úµÄ×Ó¹«Ë¾ÔÚ2010£2014Äêǰºóͨ¹ýÃÀ¹ú½áËãÁ˳¬¹ý1ÒÚÃÀÔªÓëSkycomÏà¹ØµÄ½»Òס£
Many of the misrepresentations at issue were in direct response to a series of articles published by Reuters describing how Huawei controlled Skycom£¬ and alleging that Skycom had attempted to import U£®S£®£manufactured computer equipment into Iran in violation of U£®S£® sanctions£® One of the Reuters articles reported that Meng was a member of the board of directors of Skycom for several years£® In statements reported in those Reuters articles£¬ Huawei denied control of Skycom or violations of law£®
Ðí¶àÏà¹ØµÄÐé¼Ù³ÂÊö¶¼ÊÇÖ±½Ó»ØÓ¦Â·Í¸Éç·¢±íµÄһϵÁÐÃèÊö»ªÎªÈçºÎ¿Ø¹ÉSkycomµÄÎÄÕ¡£ÕâЩÎÄÕ»¹Ö¸³ö£¬SkycomÊÔͼΥ·´ÃÀ¹úµÄÖÆ²Ã·¨°¸£¬½«ÃÀ¹úÖÆÔìµÄ¼ÆËã»úÉ豸½ø¿Úµ½ÒÁÀÊ¡£Ò»ÆªÂ·Í¸ÉçµÄÎÄÕ±¨µÀ˵£¬ÃÏÍíÖÛµ£ÈÎSkycomµÄ¶Ê»á³ÉÔ±ÒѾÊýÄê¡£»ªÎªÕë¶ÔÕâЩÎÄÕ·¢±íµÄÉùÃ÷ÖзñÈÏÁ˿عÉSkycomºÍÎ¥·´·¨ÂÉ¡£
According to information obtained from international financial institutions that conducted business with Huawei£¬ after the Reuters articles were published£¬ several of them£¬ including Financial Institution 1£¬ asked Huawei whether the allegations regarding their control of Skycom and business with Iran made in the Reuters articles were true£® In response to those questions£¬ Huawei employees and executives made a series of misrepresentations£¬ both publicly and in private communications£¬ with various banking executives£¬ among other things£¬ denying Huawei¡¯s control of Skycom and claiming Huawei did not violate U£®S£® sanctions law£®
¸ù¾ÝÓ뻪Ϊ¿ªÕ¹ÒµÎñµÄ¹ú¼Ê½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹µÄÐÅÏ¢£¬Â·Í¸ÉçµÄÎÄÕ·¢±íÒԺ󣬰üÀ¨½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹1ÔÚÄÚµÄÊý¼Ò»ú¹¹¶¼Ñ¯ÎÊÁË»ªÎª£ºÂ·Í¸ÉçÎÄÕÂÖÐÌá¼°µÄ¹ØÓڿعÉSkycomºÍÓëÒÁÀÊ¿ªÕ¹ÒµÎñµÄÖ¸¿ØÊÇ·ñÊôʵ¡£×÷Ϊ¶ÔÎÊÌâµÄ»ØÓ¦£¬»ªÎªµÄ¹ÍÔ±ºÍ¸ß¹ÜÃÇÔÚ¹«¿ª³¡ºÏÒÔ¼°Ë½Ï¹µÍ¨Öж¼¶ÔÒøÐи߹Ü×öÁËһϵÁеIJ»Êµ³ÂÊö£¬Öصã·ñÈÏÁË»ªÎª¿Ø¹ÉSkycom£¬²¢Ðû³Æ»ªÎªÃ»ÓÐÎ¥·´ÃÀ¹úµÄÖÆ²Ã·¨¡£
For example£¬ after the Reuters articles were published£¬ Financial Institution 1 requested that Huawei provide further information and clarification regarding the relationship of Huawei and Skycom£® Although those inquiries were not addressed to Meng£¬ on or about August 2013£¬ Meng arranged for a meeting with an executive of Financial Institution 1£¬ and during that meeting£¬ made a number of misrepresentations to an executive of Financial Institution 1£®
ÀýÈ磬·͸ÉçµÄÎÄÕ·¢±íÒԺ󣬽ðÈÚ»ú¹¹1ÒªÇó»ªÎª¾ÍÆäÓëSkycomµÄ¹ØÏµÌṩ½øÒ»²½µÄÐÅÏ¢£¬²¢×÷³ö³ÎÇå¡£¾¡¹ÜÔÚ2013Äê8ÔÂǰºó£¬ÕâЩѯÎʲ¢²»ÊÇÕë¶ÔÃÏÍíÖÛ±¾È˵쬵«Ëý°²ÅÅÁËÒ»´ÎÓë½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹1¸ß¹ÜµÄ»áÃæ¡£Õâ´Î»áÃæÖУ¬Ëý¶Ô½ðÈÚ»ú¹¹1µÄÕâλ¸ß¹Ü×öÁËһЩÐé¼Ù³ÂÊö¡£


ͼƬÐÂÎÅ
-
80ÒÚÃÀÔª¹âÏ˽ÓÈëÊг¡ÕýÔâÓö³å»÷
-
¡°¶«ÊýÎ÷Ë㡱 ³¬¼¶´ó¹¤³Ì¼´½«ÉÏÂí
-
ÍõÕ¨£¡ºàͨÁ¿²ú400G¹è¹âÄ£¿é
-
¡¸¿µÄþµÍËðºÄ¹âÏË50ÖÜÄ꡹רÌâϵÁÐ3£ºÓïÒôͨ»°ÐÂʱ´ú
-
¡¸¿µÄþµÍËðºÄ¹âÏË50ÖÜÄ꡹רÌâϵÁÐ2£º¹âÏ˳ÉÕæ
-
ר·Ã|EXFO£º¾Û½¹¸ßËÙÁìÓò£¬´òÔìÈ«ÐÂδÀ´
-
ר·Ã|³¤¹âͨÐÅÒ¶¶«£º¼á³Ö×ß³öÈ¥Õ½ÂÔ£¬´òºÃº£Íâ¹¥¼áÕ½
-
ר·Ã|»ô¶û±ÈÌØÀîÑô£º½ô¸ú¿Í»§½Å²½£¬ÓÃÐÄ×öºÃ²úÆ·
×îл¸ü¶à
-
9ÔÂ27-29ÈÕÂíÉϱ¨Ãû>>È«Êý»á2022¼¤¹â¾«Ãܼӹ¤ÓëÊý×Ö»¯ÖÆÔìÕ¹
-
9ÔÂ27ÈÕÂíÉϱ¨Ãû>>>ά¿Æ±¡¤OFweek 2022¼¤¹âÐÐÒµÄê¶ÈÆÀÑ¡
-
¾«²Ê»Ø¹ËÁ¢¼´²é¿´>>ºÏ³É´óо¾¶Ê¯Ó¢¹âÏË -- ¹âѧÉè¼ÆºÍ²ÄÁÏÑ¡Ôñ¶Ô¹âÏËÐÔÄܵÄÓ°Ïì
-
¾«²Ê»Ø¹ËÁ¢¼´²é¿´>>¡¾ÔÚÏßÑÐÌֻ᡿ÁìÓ¢Ñï·«³öº£Èý²¿Çú¡ª¡ªÖƶ¨ÓªÏúÕ½Êõ
-
¾«²Ê»Ø¹ËÁ¢¼´²é¿´>>¡¾ÔÚÏßÑÐÌֻ᡿ AEDTµçÈÈñîºÏÉè¼ÆÁ÷³ÌÓëÓ¦Óð¸Àý
-
¾«²Ê»Ø¹ËÁ¢¼´²é¿´>>ANSYS´ÅÐÔÔª¼þ¼°¿ª¹ØµçÔ´Éè¼Æ½â¾ö·½°¸ÔÚÏßÑÐÌÖ»á
ÍÆ¼öרÌâ
- 1³¤·ÉÖúÁ¦ÖйúÒÆ¶¯È¡µÃÁ½ÏîÊÀ½ç¼Ç¼
- 2×Ϲ⼯ÍÅԶʳ¤ÕÔΰ¹ú±»´ø×ßµ÷²é
- 3ÃúÆÕ¹â´ÅÉϰëÄêÀûÈóÔ¤¼ÆÔö³¤Ê®±¶£¡
- 4ÃúÆÕ¹â´ÅÒÑÐγɸ²¸Ç²úÒµÁ´µÄ²úÆ·¾ØÕó
- 5׿Òí¿Æ¼¼ÉϰëÄê¾»ÀûÈóϵø2504.92%
- 6·é»ðͨÐÅ400GÏà¸É¹è¹âÊÕ·¢Ð¾Æ¬ÒÑͶÈëʹÓÃ
- 7¹âÄ£¿é²úÒµÁ´Öð²½ÇÐÈ뼤¹âÀ×´ïÈüµÀ
- 8ÖйúµçÐÅÆô¶¯½ÓÈëÐÍOTNÉ豸À©Èݼ¯²É
- 9·é»ðͨÐÅ·¢²¼21Äê¶ÈÈ¨Òæ·ÖÅÉʵʩ¹«¸æ
- 10ÖйúµçÐŹâÏËÊÕ·¢Æ÷É豸À©Èݼ¯²É
- ¼¤¹âÆ÷¸ß¼¶ÏúÊÛ¾ÀíÉϺ£ÊÐ/ºç¿ÚÇø
- ¹âÆ÷¼þÑз¢¹¤³Ìʦ¸£½¨Ê¡/¸£ÖÝÊÐ
- ·â×°¹¤³Ìʦ±±¾©ÊÐ/º£µíÇø
- ¹âÆ÷¼þÎïÀí¹¤³Ìʦ±±¾©ÊÐ/º£µíÇø
- ÏúÊÛ×ܼࣨ¹âÆ÷¼þ£©±±¾©ÊÐ/º£µíÇø
- ×Ô¶¯»¯¸ß¼¶¹¤³Ìʦ¹ã¶«Ê¡/ÉîÛÚÊÐ
- ¸ß¼¶Èí¼þ¹¤³Ìʦ¹ã¶«Ê¡/ÉîÛÚÊÐ
- ¼¼Êõר¼Ò¹ã¶«Ê¡/½ÃÅÊÐ
- ½á¹¹¹¤³Ìʦ¹ã¶«Ê¡/ÉîÛÚÊÐ
- ¼¤¹âÑз¢¹¤³Ìʦ±±¾©ÊÐ/²ýÆ½Çø
·¢±íÆÀÂÛ
ÇëÊäÈëÆÀÂÛÄÚÈÝ...
ÇëÊäÈëÆÀÂÛ/ÆÀÂÛ³¤¶È6~500¸ö×Ö
ÔÝÎÞÆÀÂÛ
ÔÝÎÞÆÀÂÛ